<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia and the Natural Selection of Truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chriskenton.com/2009/08/wikipedia-and-the-natural-selection-of-truth.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chriskenton.com/2009/08/wikipedia-and-the-natural-selection-of-truth.html</link>
	<description>Marketing AND Technology AND Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:24:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kenton</title>
		<link>http://www.chriskenton.com/2009/08/wikipedia-and-the-natural-selection-of-truth.html/comment-page-1#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kenton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriskenton.com/?p=627#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>@Rob

I think you nailed a big part of the challenge right there. Wikipedia is supposed to be a reference source--a resource you turn to with confidence that it&#039;s accurate and true. But it&#039;s been reduced to point/counter-point, and judging from what we&#039;re seeing in media, especially in the realm of politics, even basic facts are no longer objective if there&#039;s someone willing to argue against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rob</p>
<p>I think you nailed a big part of the challenge right there. Wikipedia is supposed to be a reference source&#8211;a resource you turn to with confidence that it&#8217;s accurate and true. But it&#8217;s been reduced to point/counter-point, and judging from what we&#8217;re seeing in media, especially in the realm of politics, even basic facts are no longer objective if there&#8217;s someone willing to argue against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Macdonald</title>
		<link>http://www.chriskenton.com/2009/08/wikipedia-and-the-natural-selection-of-truth.html/comment-page-1#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriskenton.com/?p=627#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the op ed section of newspapers gives a format that can apply to Wikipedia.  &quot;Point/Counter-Point&quot;.  How seriously we take the differing points of view is another matter.  As humorist Dave Barry said, newspaper columnists can wake from a dead sleep and vociferate passionately about any issue from either side of the issue, depending on what their editor wants represented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the op ed section of newspapers gives a format that can apply to Wikipedia.  &#8220;Point/Counter-Point&#8221;.  How seriously we take the differing points of view is another matter.  As humorist Dave Barry said, newspaper columnists can wake from a dead sleep and vociferate passionately about any issue from either side of the issue, depending on what their editor wants represented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.chriskenton.com/2009/08/wikipedia-and-the-natural-selection-of-truth.html/comment-page-1#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriskenton.com/?p=627#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>loving the navel-gazing already</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loving the navel-gazing already</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
